Prediction of Michiel Schapers vs Tim Pawsat Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Schapers vs T. Pawsat

Michiel Schapers

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'6" (198 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

223

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Tim Pawsat

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'6" (198 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

223

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Schapers 1 - 0 Pawsat

They have played 2 sets in total, with Michiel Schapers winning 2 and Tim Pawsat winning 0. The last match between Michiel Schapers and Tim Pawsat was at the Bristol, 13-06-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Michiel Schapers getting the victory 6-3 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Schapers	1
Pawsat	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Bristol(06-13-88)

Stats

Michiel Schapers

Tim Pawsat

M. Schapers vs T. Pawsat H2H Profile

M. Schapers	Stats	T. Pawsat
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
49.01% (198-206)	Career Total W/L	50.00% (16-16)
1	Grass	0
1	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Schapers vs T. Pawsat Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michiel Schapers has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tim Pawsat has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michiel Schapers, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tim Pawsat has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Michiel Schapers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tim Pawsat has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Michiel Schapers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tim Pawsat winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Michiel Schapers has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 47/58). Tim Pawsat has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 3/2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 13/13).
Player level: In the last year, Michiel Schapers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tim Pawsat has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Michiel Schapers winning 1 times and Tim Pawsat being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Michiel Schapers winning 2 and Tim Pawsat winning 0.
The last match between Michiel Schapers and Tim Pawsat was at the Bristol, 13-06-1988, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Michiel Schapers getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michiel Schapers has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tim Pawsat has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michiel Schapers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tim Pawsat has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Michiel Schapers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tim Pawsat has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Michiel Schapers vs Tim Pawsat Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Schapers vs T. Pawsat H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Schapers	Stats	T. Pawsat
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	8
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Schapers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Rosmalen - 07-06-1993
R1 Paul KilderryP. Kilderry	L	6-1 5-7 7-6(4)	Stats
Seoul - 19-04-1993
R1 Tommy HoT. Ho	W	6-7(5) 7-5 6-4	Stats
R2 Yong-Il YoonY. Yoon	W	6-3 7-6(6)	Stats
QF Christo Van RensburgC. Van	L	7-6(5) 7-5	Stats
Durban - 29-03-1993
R1 David RiklD. Rikl	L	7-6(4) 7-5	Stats

View All

T. Pawsat Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Livingston - 07-08-1989
R3 Paul AnnaconeP. Annacone	L	4-6 7-6 6-4	Stats
Nagoya CH - 26-04-1989
R4 Jeremy BatesJ. Bates	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
R3 David LewisD. Lewis	W	6-3 6-7 6-4	Stats
Guangzhou CH - 09-11-1988
R3 Joseph RussellJ. Russell	W	4-6 6-1 6-4	Stats
R4 Richard WhichelloR. Whichello	L	6-7 6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Schapers vs T. Pawsat Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Schapers	Stats	T. Pawsat
49.01% (198/206)	YTD Win/Loss	50.00% (16/16)
48.73% (516/543)	Sets Win/Loss	46.05% (35/41)
49.45% (5077/5189)	Games Win/Loss	48.43% (354/377)
50.00% (78/78)	Hard Win/Loss	50.00% (13/13)
44.76% (47/58)	Clay Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
47.62% (40/44)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/1)
55.93% (33/26)	Grass Win/Loss	60.00% (3/2)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
328	Average Opponent Rank	367.63
50.00% (30/30)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
39.29% (11/17)	Masters W/L	50.00% (1/1)
56.52% (13/10)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
46.03% (110/129)	Main Tour W/L	25.00% (2/6)
62.00% (31/19)	Challenger W/L	59.09% (13/9)
49% (152/313)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	50% (16/32)
48% (42/87)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
36% (9/25)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
49% (66/135)	Deciding Set Win %	75% (9/12)
81% (192/155)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (15/13)
19% (192/36)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (15/2)
19% (209/40)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (17/3)